Tuesday, June 20, 2006

More Obama Stuff

Tbogg speaks.
I would buy Obama's deference to leaders in the Democratic party if I felt that were any leaders in the Democratic party (Anyone? Anyone?) but he doesn't seem to want to fill the void and so we end up with a bland parsing pol who spends all of his time trying to not leave anything distinctive on his permanent record...and we already have an Evan Bayh. Personally I'm tired of Democrats who are obsessed with process and talking about how they need to get their message out. There comes a time to decide what you stand for...and then stand for it.

I don't have a horse in the 2008 Presidential election and I'll vote for any Democrat short of the Joe's (Lieberman and Biden), I only have one requirement for my candidate: someone who can win. And for that, and because both parties bases are pretty much set in stone, you need someone who can excite the mushy middle (also known as the "independents") and I don't think that you can get them off the couch them with more mush.

If you want to lead the party, then lead. Otherwise stop wasting my time and sucking the air out of the room...

Word. Obama, contrary to what he seems to think, at this point probably has the least to lose by taking a bold stand on something. Being both near the bottom of the list in the Senate and one of the most popular Democrats out there puts him in a position to take a risk. I understtand wanting to build a record before making waves, but when he Republicans control everything and the casualty rate in Iraq is creeping up to 3,000, there is little time for process and caution. Obama should take a cue from the lukewarm response to Hillary's baby steps onto the campaign floor, another junior senator who could have set the pond and fire and did not.

Okay I'll stop picking on Barack for now. Next up, why hasn't someone punched Ann Coulter in the neck.

2 comments:

Kate said...

Maybe Obama is like so many other politicians in our party and he doesn't actually believe in anything at all, at least nothing that moves him enough to get him to stand up and shout it out loud.

Or perhaps he's listening to all of the DLC consultants out there who insist that being as quiet and still as a rock on the bottom of the lake is preferable to being a living, breathing person with ideas and opinions, even occasionally contradictory ones. (I have to agree with Kos on that one -- the consultants are sucking the life blood out of our party and our politicians.)

Or perhaps he's saving up his cache for a big coming out as a true progressive with actual ideas. Now that would be cool.

I'm with TBogg on his no to the Joes but yes to everyone else. We might complain about our generally lifeless, spineless Democrats, but compared to the smarmy, fascist Republicans they're just barely short of heroic. Relativity isn't all bad.

Lenora said...

I wholeheartedly agree. I don't mean to harp to much on Obama's lack of real dynamism, especially since it's endemic to the party these days.

I think that a reality check regarding Obama is necessary because we need to be a bit more cynical about the way run campaigns. We have a tendency to lionize are favorites until they slip up then we cry foul. The Republicans don't do this. They put a C student coke head in front of the people and tell us with a straight face that he is the best man for the job. We must learn this art,