Monday, January 22, 2007
Sunday, January 21, 2007
BEARS WIN!! ONTO SUPERBOWL
Friday, January 12, 2007
New Mexico to Lead Surge for Impeachment

New Mexico State Senator Gerald Ortiz y Pino has agreed to introduce an impeachment resolution for New Mexico next week at the start of the 2007 session.
NOTE: Sec. 603. Inception of impeachment proceedings in the House. This refers to Jefferson's Manual—the House uses it as a supplement to its standing rules.And it's a twofer—it targets both Bush and Cheney.
In the House there are various methods of setting an impeachment in motion:
[...] by charges transmitted from the legislature of a State (III, 2469)
Oh, fair New Mexico!...our hearts with pride o'er flow indeed.
Boxer's Left Hook or Low Blow?
Steve links to a New York Post article accusing Barbara Boxer of attacking Condoleezza Rice with below the belt questioning. All's fair in love and war, as they say. Condo clearly does not have the necessary empathy for those who are making the ultimate sacrifice, maybe because she ate her young soon after birth. I know that's a question I would've asked her, were I Senator Boxer.
But as far as Rice having no lovahs...
And Sidney goes on in the same Salon piece:
But as far as Rice having no lovahs...
Ultimately, Baker's political strategy counted on the decisive intervention of one person in the president's closed inner circle -- who sees him alone and could not be kept from him, and on whom he has become dependent for support and trusts implicitly...What does Sidney Blumenthal mean by "could not be kept from him"? I know what I would mean if I described a relationship that way.
And Sidney goes on in the same Salon piece:
On the other [side] was the president, who had raised her into Baker's seventh-floor office in Foggy Bottom, whom she had flattered as the equal of Lincoln and Churchill, and whom, in a telling Freudian slip, she had referred to as "my husband" before a roomful of reporters and editors of the New York Times.Her husband? I wonder if they'll be allowed conjugal visits when the revolution comes.
Saturday, December 09, 2006
Real Men Don't Cry or eat Quiche
All the tears in the world are not going to put Humpty Dumpty back together again. Bush Sr. may have been talking about Jebbie, but make no mistake, he was weeping about Dubya. In his father's own words the measure of a man is in how he handles both victory and defeat. He handled a false "victory" by saying,
He handled defeat by cheating, by stacking the deck, by stealing not just one but two elections by any and all means necessary.
Cry me a river, grampa, you should've drowned him when you had the chance.
I've earned capital in this election -- and I'm going to spend it..."
He handled defeat by cheating, by stacking the deck, by stealing not just one but two elections by any and all means necessary.
Cry me a river, grampa, you should've drowned him when you had the chance.
Sunday, December 03, 2006
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
Saturday, October 28, 2006
We Live in F*****land*
When Limbaugh says something horrifying, it really isn't all that surprising. Limbaugh left the world of civil discourse so long ago there's no point calling him a fucker yet again.
So why is this latest fucker moment worth noting?
Because of all the other fuckers it brings out of the woodwork.
This "attack the suffering" mentality has been one of the most extraordinary things to emerge on the right over the last few years. On the one hand it's sort of part of the outrage that blames the poor for poverty, promiscuity for rape, etc. But I think that part of the post 9/11 whackoness also is this sense where the idea of somone else suffering more than you is simply unacceptable and rather than acknowledge that all suffering is not equal, you attack the sufferer.
There is a certain truth to all being fair game once it enters the political arena. But there is distinct difference between having an issue with Michael J. Fox politicizine his disease and calling him out for "faking." And more power to him for being political, especially now. The stakes are higher for him, as the are for the Iraq vets, and the 9/11 widows.
*Quote taken from roomie Spence.
So why is this latest fucker moment worth noting?
Because of all the other fuckers it brings out of the woodwork.
This "attack the suffering" mentality has been one of the most extraordinary things to emerge on the right over the last few years. On the one hand it's sort of part of the outrage that blames the poor for poverty, promiscuity for rape, etc. But I think that part of the post 9/11 whackoness also is this sense where the idea of somone else suffering more than you is simply unacceptable and rather than acknowledge that all suffering is not equal, you attack the sufferer.
There is a certain truth to all being fair game once it enters the political arena. But there is distinct difference between having an issue with Michael J. Fox politicizine his disease and calling him out for "faking." And more power to him for being political, especially now. The stakes are higher for him, as the are for the Iraq vets, and the 9/11 widows.
*Quote taken from roomie Spence.
Thursday, October 26, 2006
Cheney Admits to Having NO BRAIN
Not that we had any doubt, but admitting that you have a problem is the first step toward recovery. Get well, Dick.
Sunday, October 22, 2006
The Audacity of Obama
Well, the inevitable save-the-date announcement of Barack Obama's true intentions has arrived. Yup. It's all about him. No matter that the invasion of Iraq is getting bleaker by the hour; we could be at the brink of a nuclear war; and Bush appears to be preparing to flee to South America when the shit hits the fan--the conversation must be brought back to the importance of what the country can do for Barack Obama. I mean, wouldn't someone who really served his constituents and country be calling for investigations into the corruption that has brought our democracy to its knees?
He sure has come a long way from young Barry Obama, who tried hard to fit in, rejecting his Kenyan heritage until he saw how useful it could be for him. It's interesting to me that in the only real political campaign he's run, he had his head handed to him by voters on the southside of Chicago who overwhelming re-elected Bobby Rush to Congress. And I have more than a few questions about how he treated his mentor, Alice Palmer, as he ran her over to get her seat in the state senate.
But now, his face and name are everywhere. He's out selling his books and himself. But the conversation shouldn't be about Obama, it should be about this nation and what needs to be done to coexist peacefully in this world and how to enrich the lives of all our citizens.
He sure has come a long way from young Barry Obama, who tried hard to fit in, rejecting his Kenyan heritage until he saw how useful it could be for him. It's interesting to me that in the only real political campaign he's run, he had his head handed to him by voters on the southside of Chicago who overwhelming re-elected Bobby Rush to Congress. And I have more than a few questions about how he treated his mentor, Alice Palmer, as he ran her over to get her seat in the state senate.
But now, his face and name are everywhere. He's out selling his books and himself. But the conversation shouldn't be about Obama, it should be about this nation and what needs to be done to coexist peacefully in this world and how to enrich the lives of all our citizens.
Wednesday, September 20, 2006
Wednesday, September 13, 2006
Ann Richards, 1933-2006
From the NYT:
My earliest memory of Ann Richards was of her infamous speech at the 1988 Democratic Convention. There are people who will no doubt eulogize her more thoroughly and elegantly than I can. But Ann represented a seldom seen aspect of Texas politics, namely the scrappy, populist, take-no-shit Democrats that make the Bush clan look like the limp hypocrites that they are.
Former Gov. Ann Richards, the witty and flamboyant Democrat who went from homemaker to national political celebrity, died Wednesday night after a battle with cancer, a family spokeswoman said. She was 73.
Ann Richards, the former governor of Texas, in 2004.
She died at home surrounded by her family, the spokeswoman said. Richards was found to have esophageal cancer in March and underwent chemotherapy treatments.
My earliest memory of Ann Richards was of her infamous speech at the 1988 Democratic Convention. There are people who will no doubt eulogize her more thoroughly and elegantly than I can. But Ann represented a seldom seen aspect of Texas politics, namely the scrappy, populist, take-no-shit Democrats that make the Bush clan look like the limp hypocrites that they are.
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
Garrison Keillor's Apology to Republicans
A friend emailed this to me and I thought it was hilarious:
My personal favorite? Backed-up Baptists, although Constipated Christians is more inclusive.
Having been called names, one looks back at one's own angry outbursts over the years, and I recall having at various times referred to Republicans as:
hairy-backed swamp developers,
fundamentalist bullies,
freelance racists,
hobby cops,
sweatshop tycoons,
line jumpers,
marsupial moms,
aluminum-siding salesmen,
misanthropic frat boys,
ninja ditto heads,
shrieking midgets,
tax cheats,
cheese merchants,
cat stranglers,
pill pushers,
nihilists in golf pants,
backed-up Baptists,
the grand pooh-bahs of Percodan,
mouth breathers,
testosterone junkies
and brown shirts in pinstripes
I look at those words now, and 'cat stranglers' seems excessive to me. The number of cat stranglers in the ranks of the Republican Party is surely low, and that reference was hurtful to Republicans and to cat owners. I feel sheepish about it.
My personal favorite? Backed-up Baptists, although Constipated Christians is more inclusive.
Monday, September 04, 2006
Bullshit Detectors at Alert Level RED
ABC looked back at the events of September 11, 2001, and yelled, "GET ME REWRITE!" And the new villain is...(drum roll)...Bill Clinton. These guys have no imagination.
Steve has a a good idea.
Steve has a a good idea.
Sunday, September 03, 2006
Bush, the Absurd
The Professor and I were discussing the recent White House claim that Bush has read 60 books so far this year, including an 800-pager, American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer.
random thoughts:
Ok...8 months divided by 60 books = a feat conceivable for anyone but Bush.
If you calculate his 2hour+ workouts each day, his inability to stay up past 9pm, and the "presidenting" he's supposed to be doing between the workouts and the sleeping... I mean, he'd have to be reading close to 3 hours a day, and, quite frankly, I don't think he's capable.
When it comes to the things that separate us from the apes, he's demonstrated he's got the attention span of a kumquat.
random thoughts:
Ok...8 months divided by 60 books = a feat conceivable for anyone but Bush.
If you calculate his 2hour+ workouts each day, his inability to stay up past 9pm, and the "presidenting" he's supposed to be doing between the workouts and the sleeping... I mean, he'd have to be reading close to 3 hours a day, and, quite frankly, I don't think he's capable.
When it comes to the things that separate us from the apes, he's demonstrated he's got the attention span of a kumquat.
Thursday, August 31, 2006
More on New Orleans
Adolph Reed in The Progressive on New Orleans.
With each passing day, a crucially significant political distinction in New Orleans gets clearer and clearer: Property owners are able to assert their interests in the polity, while non-owners are nearly as invisible in civic life now as in the early eighteenth century.
Among other things, the travesty in New Orleans reminds us that capitalism enshrines the prerogatives of property owners—and the bigger the holdings, the more substantial the voice.
This underscores why a simplistically racial interpretation of the injustices perpetrated in New Orleans is inadequate, even when those injustices cluster heavily along racial lines. Substantial numbers of blacks as well as whites are in a position to benefit materially from this regime; blacks as well as whites support the de facto creation of a property owners’ republic. It is possible simultaneously to include black people as stakeholders in the equation for rebuilding the city and to exclude poor people. This is the truth beneath the 200 sociologists’ assurance that their proposal for dispersing the poor would not “depopulate the city of its historically black communities.” But this is a sleight of hand that seeks to sanitize class cleansing with a patter of racial respect.
With each passing day, a crucially significant political distinction in New Orleans gets clearer and clearer: Property owners are able to assert their interests in the polity, while non-owners are nearly as invisible in civic life now as in the early eighteenth century.
Among other things, the travesty in New Orleans reminds us that capitalism enshrines the prerogatives of property owners—and the bigger the holdings, the more substantial the voice.
This underscores why a simplistically racial interpretation of the injustices perpetrated in New Orleans is inadequate, even when those injustices cluster heavily along racial lines. Substantial numbers of blacks as well as whites are in a position to benefit materially from this regime; blacks as well as whites support the de facto creation of a property owners’ republic. It is possible simultaneously to include black people as stakeholders in the equation for rebuilding the city and to exclude poor people. This is the truth beneath the 200 sociologists’ assurance that their proposal for dispersing the poor would not “depopulate the city of its historically black communities.” But this is a sleight of hand that seeks to sanitize class cleansing with a patter of racial respect.
Wednesday, August 30, 2006
NOLA, still here, inspite of it all
I've read, here and there, different accounts of what happened a year ago, and what's happened since. But Kate is back, with the beautiful writing that gets past the debris to what was New Orleans.
random thoughts:
Why did CNN send their African correspondent to cover Katrina? A wierd echo of Bush when he said, “I know the people of this part of the world are suffering…”
I wonder, also, why so much reaction to the displaced New Orleanians is resentful and even hostile...you'd think that when Hurricane Katrina uncovered a group of American citizens who have been living below what most would consider "the poverty line"--going without even basic housing and healthcare for generations--you'd think that the reaction would be more charitable for longer than a year. The logic of this reaction escapes me.
Anyway...here's to New Orleans...
random thoughts:
Why did CNN send their African correspondent to cover Katrina? A wierd echo of Bush when he said, “I know the people of this part of the world are suffering…”
I wonder, also, why so much reaction to the displaced New Orleanians is resentful and even hostile...you'd think that when Hurricane Katrina uncovered a group of American citizens who have been living below what most would consider "the poverty line"--going without even basic housing and healthcare for generations--you'd think that the reaction would be more charitable for longer than a year. The logic of this reaction escapes me.
Anyway...here's to New Orleans...
Wednesday, August 09, 2006
The Poopyhead Rationale
Lieberman:"I'm running as an independent because the winner was mean!"
The senator said last night he was staying in the race because Mr. Lamont had run a primary campaign of “insults” and “partisan polarizing” that relentlessly blamed Mr. Lieberman for President Bush’s wartime policies, which the senator has supported and defended but also criticized at various points.
Tuesday, August 08, 2006
Hey hey hey, Goodbye
Well it wasn't a blood bath, but Lieberman's gotta be hurting right about now. I doubt he'll truly understand why he lost this race. He'll blame the blogs, the "virulently anti-semitic far left," anything but his own tone-deafness. I hope that his lack of basic courage prevents him from seriously going for an independent run, but one cannot underestimate his narcissism.
Meanwhile, hurray for Lamont. Onwards to November.
Meanwhile, hurray for Lamont. Onwards to November.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

